Comparação: Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 5

Prémio

Hankook

ION Evo

VS

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Test profile

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

BluEarth-XT

Roadhawk 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Primacy 5

Número de testes

1

5

1

6

3

Best position

#1

#7

#3

#2

#1

Average position

1.0

2.2

7.0

4.7

3.3

4.7

Teste mais recente

2025

2026

Tamanhos disponíveis

64

63

—

146

40

126

Molhado

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

59%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin Primacy 5

58%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

75%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Frenagem úmida

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

62%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin Primacy 5

65%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

38%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin Primacy 5

51%

Curva em círculo molhado

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Custos

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

Resistência ao rolamento

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

Quilometragem

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

45%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Conforto

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

82%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin Primacy 5

1%

Conforto

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

69%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Ruído exterior

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

95%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Seco

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

66%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin Primacy 5

73%

Travagem a seco

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

64%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin Primacy 5

76%

Manuseamento a seco

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

67%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin Primacy 5

69%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 5

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

BluEarth-XT

Roadhawk 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Primacy 5

Test profile

Molhado

Custos

Conforto

Seco

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação