Comparação: Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005

Prémio

Hankook

ION Evo

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test profile

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

BluEarth-XT

Roadhawk 2

Turanza T005

Número de testes

1

5

3

1

6

33

Best position

#1

#2

#7

#3

#1

Average position

1.0

2.2

3.7

7.0

4.7

4.1

Teste mais recente

2025

2026

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

64

63

34

—

146

658

Molhado

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

59%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

82%

Frenagem úmida

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

62%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

78%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

38%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

78%

Curva em círculo molhado

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

85%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

75%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

73%

Custos

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

81%

Quilometragem

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

45%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

69%

Preço/valor

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

60%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

60%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

53%

Resistência ao rolamento

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

93%

Conforto

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

82%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

76%

Conforto

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

69%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

71%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

81%

Ruído exterior

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

95%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

62%

Seco

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

66%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

83%

Travagem a seco

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

64%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Manuseamento a seco

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

67%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

BluEarth-XT

Roadhawk 2

Turanza T005

Test profile

Molhado

Custos

Conforto

Seco

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação