Comparação: Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

Prémio

Hankook

ION Evo

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test profile

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Cinturato (C3)

Número de testes

1

5

3

2

3

4

Best position

#1

#2

#1

#2

#1

Average position

1.0

2.2

3.7

1.0

3.3

Teste mais recente

2025

2026

Tamanhos disponíveis

64

63

34

23

40

—

Molhado

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

94%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Frenagem úmida

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

97%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

94%

Curva em círculo molhado

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

89%

Custos

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

87%

Resistência ao rolamento

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

87%

Conforto

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

89%

Conforto

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

81%

Ruído exterior

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Seco

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Travagem a seco

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Manuseamento a seco

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Cinturato (C3)

Test profile

Molhado

Custos

Conforto

Seco

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação