4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport

Test profile

Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Potenza Sport
Número de testes
1
5
3
2
3
23
Best position
#1
#1
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
1.0
2.2
3.7
1.0
3.3
3.3
Teste mais recente
2025
2025
2025
2025
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
64
63
34
23
40
188

Molhado

Molhado
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
89%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
75%
Frenagem úmida
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
86%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
79%
Curva em círculo molhado
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
92%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
93%

Custos

Custos
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
61%
Resistência ao rolamento
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
58%
Quilometragem
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
85%

Seco

Seco
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Travagem a seco
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
88%
Manuseamento a seco
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
85%

Conforto

Conforto
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
80%
Conforto
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
70%
Ruído exterior
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
70%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação