Comparação: Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Prémio

Hankook

ION Evo

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test profile

ION Evo

e.Ziex

BluEarth-XT

Primacy 4+

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Número de testes

1

3

1

13

3

Best position

#1

#2

#7

#1

#2

Average position

1.0

3.7

7.0

4.3

3.3

Teste mais recente

2025

2026

Tamanhos disponíveis

64

34

—

123

40

Molhado

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

59%

Michelin Primacy 4+

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

38%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Curva em círculo molhado

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

77%

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

75%

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

Michelin Primacy 4+

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Frenagem úmida

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

62%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Custos

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Resistência ao rolamento

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

Michelin Primacy 4+

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Quilometragem

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

45%

Michelin Primacy 4+

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Conforto

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

82%

Michelin Primacy 4+

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Conforto

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

69%

Michelin Primacy 4+

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Ruído exterior

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

95%

Michelin Primacy 4+

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Seco

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

66%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Travagem a seco

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

64%

Michelin Primacy 4+

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Manuseamento a seco

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

67%

Michelin Primacy 4+

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

BluEarth-XT

Primacy 4+

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

Molhado

Custos

Conforto

Seco

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação