4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test profile

Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Yokohama
BluEarth-XT
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Número de testes
1
3
1
2
Best position
#1
#2
#7
#1
Average position
1.0
3.7
7.0
1.0
Teste mais recente
2025
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
64
34
23

Molhado

Molhado
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
59%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
51%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Frenagem úmida
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
38%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%

Custos

Custos
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
51%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Resistência ao rolamento
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
51%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%

Conforto

Conforto
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Ruído exterior
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Conforto
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%

Seco

Seco
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Travagem a seco
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
64%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Manuseamento a seco
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação