Comparação: Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Prémio

Hankook

ION Evo

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

UltraContact NXT

Test profile

ION Evo

e.Ziex

BluEarth-XT

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Número de testes

1

3

1

26

3

5

Best position

#1

#2

#7

#1

#2

#1

Average position

1.0

3.7

7.0

2.2

3.3

2.2

Teste mais recente

2025

2026

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

64

34

—

66

40

63

Molhado

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

59%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Curva em círculo molhado

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Frenagem úmida

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

62%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

38%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Custos

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Preço/valor

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

60%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Resistência ao rolamento

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Quilometragem

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

45%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Conforto

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

82%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Conforto

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Ruído exterior

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

95%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Seco

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

66%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Travagem a seco

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

64%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Manuseamento a seco

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

67%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

ION Evo

e.Ziex

BluEarth-XT

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test profile

Molhado

Custos

Conforto

Seco

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação