Comparação: Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental SportContact 7

Prémio

Hankook

ION Evo

VS

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 S

UltraContact NXT

Test profile

ION Evo

e.Ziex

BluEarth-XT

Turanza 6

Efficientgrip Performance 2

SportContact 7

Número de testes

1

3

1

13

3

15

Best position

#1

#2

#7

#2

#1

Average position

1.0

3.7

7.0

6.2

3.3

1.2

Teste mais recente

2025

2026

Tamanhos disponíveis

64

34

—

225

40

122

Molhado

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

59%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental SportContact 7

84%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Continental SportContact 7

66%

Frenagem úmida

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

62%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental SportContact 7

95%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

38%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Continental SportContact 7

85%

Curva em círculo molhado

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

77%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Continental SportContact 7

86%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

75%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Continental SportContact 7

89%

Custos

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Continental SportContact 7

79%

Quilometragem

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

45%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Resistência ao rolamento

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Continental SportContact 7

79%

Conforto

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

82%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental SportContact 7

78%

Conforto

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

69%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Continental SportContact 7

80%

Ruído exterior

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

95%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Continental SportContact 7

75%

Seco

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

66%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental SportContact 7

91%

Travagem a seco

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

64%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental SportContact 7

97%

Manuseamento a seco

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

67%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental SportContact 7

94%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental SportContact 7

ION Evo

e.Ziex

BluEarth-XT

Turanza 6

Efficientgrip Performance 2

SportContact 7

Test profile

Molhado

Custos

Conforto

Seco

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação