4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Test profile

Hankook
ION Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Número de testes
1
3
23
Best position
#1
#2
#1
Average position
1.0
3.7
3.3
Teste mais recente
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
64
34
176

Molhado

Molhado
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Frenagem úmida
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Curva em círculo molhado
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%

Custos

Custos
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Preço/valor
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
69%
Resistência ao rolamento
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Quilometragem
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%

Conforto

Conforto
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Ruído exterior
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Conforto
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Seco

Seco
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Travagem a seco
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Manuseamento a seco
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação