Comparação: Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. Michelin Primacy 5

Prémio

Hankook

ION Evo

VS

Also compare with

Pilot Sport 5

Cinturato (C3)

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Test profile

ION Evo

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Roadhawk 2

BluEarth-XT

Primacy 5

Número de testes

1

26

5

6

1

3

Best position

#1

#3

#7

#1

Average position

1.0

2.2

4.7

7.0

4.7

Teste mais recente

2025

2026

2025

2026

2025

2026

Tamanhos disponíveis

64

66

63

146

—

126

Molhado

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

59%

Michelin Primacy 5

58%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

Frenagem úmida

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

62%

Michelin Primacy 5

65%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

38%

Michelin Primacy 5

51%

Curva em círculo molhado

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

77%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

75%

Custos

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

Quilometragem

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

45%

Preço/valor

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

60%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

60%

Resistência ao rolamento

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

51%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

Conforto

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

82%

Michelin Primacy 5

1%

Conforto

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

71%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

69%

Ruído exterior

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

95%

Seco

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

66%

Michelin Primacy 5

73%

Travagem a seco

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

64%

Michelin Primacy 5

76%

Manuseamento a seco

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Yokohama BluEarth-XT

67%

Michelin Primacy 5

69%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. Michelin Primacy 5

ION Evo

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Roadhawk 2

BluEarth-XT

Primacy 5

Test profile

Molhado

Custos

Conforto

Seco

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação