4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Yokohama BluEarth-XT

Test profile

Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Yokohama
BluEarth-XT
Número de testes
1
26
5
6
1
Best position
#1
#1
#1
#3
#7
Average position
1.0
2.2
2.2
4.7
7.0
Teste mais recente
2025
2026
2025
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
64
66
63
146

Molhado

Molhado
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
59%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
51%
Frenagem úmida
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
62%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
38%
Curva em círculo molhado
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
75%

Custos

Custos
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
51%
Quilometragem
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
45%
Preço/valor
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
60%
Resistência ao rolamento
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
51%

Conforto

Conforto
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
82%
Conforto
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
69%
Ruído exterior
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
95%

Seco

Seco
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
66%
Travagem a seco
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
64%
Manuseamento a seco
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
67%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Mutual tests available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Testes mútuos

OrganizaçãoTemporadaAnoDimensão
AutobildAutobild
Verão
2025215/55 R18Ver

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação