4 Shops · 0+ Products
PNEULAB.EU

Comparação: Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Yokohama BluEarth-XT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Hankook ION EvoPrémio
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Continental PremiumContact 7Prémio
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Falken e.ZiexMédio-alto
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Médio-alto
YokohamaYokohama

BluEarth-XT

5.5
R13 – R
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Prémio
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPrémio
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Pilot Sport 5 UltraContact NXT

Test profile

Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
Yokohama
BluEarth-XT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
1
26
3
1
3
1
Best position
#1
#1
#2
#7
#2
#1
Average position
1.0
2.2
3.7
7.0
3.3
1.0
Teste mais recente
2025
2026
2025
2025
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
64
66
34
—
40
64

Molhado

Molhado
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
59%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Frenagem úmida
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Curva em círculo molhado
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%

Custos

Custos
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Preço/valor
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
60%
Resistência ao rolamento
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Quilometragem
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Seco

Seco
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Manuseamento a seco
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Travagem a seco
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Conforto

Conforto
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Conforto
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Ruído exterior
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Yokohama BluEarth-XT
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação