4 Shops · 0+ Products
PNEULAB.EU

Comparação: Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Hankook ION EvoPrémio
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Continental PremiumContact 7Prémio
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Falken e.ZiexMédio-alto
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUVPrémio
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

9.2
R16 – R22
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Prémio
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Falken e.ZiexMédio-alto
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Pilot Sport 5 UltraContact NXT

Test profile

Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
1
26
3
5
3
3
Best position
#1
#1
#2
#1
#2
#2
Average position
1.0
2.2
3.7
2.2
3.3
3.7
Teste mais recente
2025
2026
2025
2025
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
64
66
34
63
40
34

Molhado

Molhado
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Frenagem úmida
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Curva em círculo molhado
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%

Custos

Custos
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Resistência ao rolamento
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Quilometragem
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Preço/valor
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%

Conforto

Conforto
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Conforto
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Ruído exterior
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Seco

Seco
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Travagem a seco
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Manuseamento a seco
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação