4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Hankook ION Evo vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test profile

Hankook
ION Evo
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Número de testes
1
14
5
Best position
#1
#8
#1
Average position
1.0
13.4
2.2
Teste mais recente
2025
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
64
153
63

Molhado

Molhado
Hankook ION Evo
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Hankook ION Evo
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Frenagem úmida
Hankook ION Evo
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Hankook ION Evo
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Curva em círculo molhado
Hankook ION Evo
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Hankook ION Evo
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%

Custos

Custos
Hankook ION Evo
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Quilometragem
Hankook ION Evo
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Preço/valor
Hankook ION Evo
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
87%
Resistência ao rolamento
Hankook ION Evo
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%

Conforto

Conforto
Hankook ION Evo
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Conforto
Hankook ION Evo
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Ruído exterior
Hankook ION Evo
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Seco

Seco
Hankook ION Evo
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Travagem a seco
Hankook ION Evo
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Manuseamento a seco
Hankook ION Evo
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação