Comparação: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Prémio

GoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

VS

ION Evo

PremiumContact 7

9.8

R16 – R21

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

Ventus Evo

Test profile

UltraGrip Performance+

ION Evo

PremiumContact 7

Número de testes

23

1

26

Best position

#1

Average position

3.3

1.0

2.2

Teste mais recente

2025

2026

Tamanhos disponíveis

176

64

66

Seco

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Travagem a seco

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Manuseamento a seco

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Resposta da direcção seca

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Continental PremiumContact 7

96%

Mudança de faixa seca

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

74%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Neve

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Travagem de neve

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Manipulação da neve

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Tracção na neve

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Encanto da neve

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

88%

Molhado

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Frenagem úmida

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Curva em círculo molhado

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Custos

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Resistência ao rolamento

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Quilometragem

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Preço/valor

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

69%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Conforto

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Ruído exterior

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Conforto

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Ruído interior

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Continental PremiumContact 7

88%

Gelo

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

UltraGrip Performance+

ION Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test profile

Seco

Neve

Molhado

Custos

Conforto

Gelo

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação