4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof P vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Test profile

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Nokian
WR Snowproof P
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Número de testes
24
7
23
Best position
#1
#4
#1
Average position
2.7
9.7
6.7
Teste mais recente
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
302
55
107

Molhado

Molhado
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
64%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Frenagem úmida
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
60%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
35%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Curva em círculo molhado
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
75%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Desempenho em molhado
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%

Neve

Neve
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Tracção na neve
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Travagem de neve
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Manipulação da neve
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
62%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
68%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Encanto da neve
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
64%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Desempenho na neve
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Orientação lateral sobre a neve
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%

Seco

Seco
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
90%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Travagem a seco
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
92%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Manuseamento a seco
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
88%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Mudança de faixa seca
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
93%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Resposta da direcção seca
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Desempenho em piso seco
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%

Conforto

Conforto
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
92%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Ruído exterior
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
92%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Conforto
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
71%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Ruído interior
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%

Custos

Custos
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Resistência ao rolamento
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
92%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Quilometragem
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Preço/valor
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
62%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%

Todo-o-terreno

Todo-o-terreno
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Gelo

Gelo
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação