4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Test profile

GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Número de testes
24
14
17
49
23
Best position
#1
#1
#1
#1
#1
Average position
2.7
3.6
1.7
3.2
6.7
Teste mais recente
2025
2025
2025
2024
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
302
188
80
213
107

Molhado

Molhado
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Frenagem úmida
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Curva em círculo molhado
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Desempenho em molhado
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
64%

Neve

Neve
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Tracção na neve
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
91%
Travagem de neve
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Manipulação da neve
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
62%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Encanto da neve
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Desempenho na neve
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Orientação lateral sobre a neve
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
98%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
76%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%

Seco

Seco
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Travagem a seco
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Manuseamento a seco
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Mudança de faixa seca
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
65%
Desempenho em piso seco
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Resposta da direcção seca
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Comportamento em condução seca
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%

Conforto

Conforto
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Ruído exterior
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Conforto
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
78%
Ruído interior
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%

Custos

Custos
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Resistência ao rolamento
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Quilometragem
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Preço/valor
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
60%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%

Todo-o-terreno

Todo-o-terreno
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%

Gelo

Gelo
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Travagem brusca
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
80%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação