4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
1
6
3
Best position
#1
#3
#2
Average position
1.0
4.7
3.7
Teste mais recente
2025
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
123
64
146
34

Molhado

Molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Curva em círculo molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
71%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
87%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Frenagem úmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
89%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Seco

Seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Travagem a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Manuseamento a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
93%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Custos

Custos
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
81%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Resistência ao rolamento
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
88%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Conforto

Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído exterior
GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV
70%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação