Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Prémio

GoodYear

Efficientgrip SUV

R16 – R22

VS

Prémio

GoodYear

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Test profile

Efficientgrip SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

UltraGrip Performance 3

PremiumContact 7

Número de testes

—

3

4

24

26

Best position

—

#2

#3

#1

Average position

—

3.3

12.0

2.7

2.2

Teste mais recente

—

2026

2025

2026

Tamanhos disponíveis

123

40

111

302

66

Molhado

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Frenagem úmida

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Curva em círculo molhado

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

86%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

91%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Seco

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Travagem a seco

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

72%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Manuseamento a seco

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Custos

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

70%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Resistência ao rolamento

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Quilometragem

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

56%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Conforto

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

85%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Ruído exterior

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Ruído interior

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Continental PremiumContact 7

88%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Primacy

UltraGrip Performance 3

PremiumContact 7

Test profile

Molhado

Seco

Custos

Conforto

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação