Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Dunlop Winter

Prémio

GoodYear

Efficientgrip SUV

R16 – R22

VS

Prémio

GoodYear

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Test profile

Efficientgrip SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Winter

Número de testes

—

3

1

3

2

Best position

—

#2

#1

#2

#1

Average position

—

3.3

1.0

3.7

1.5

Teste mais recente

—

2026

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

123

40

64

34

65

Molhado

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Dunlop Winter

71%

Frenagem úmida

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Dunlop Winter

84%

Curva em círculo molhado

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Dunlop Winter

63%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Dunlop Winter

67%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Seco

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dunlop Winter

69%

Travagem a seco

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dunlop Winter

73%

Manuseamento a seco

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dunlop Winter

64%

Custos

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Dunlop Winter

83%

Resistência ao rolamento

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dunlop Winter

81%

Quilometragem

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Conforto

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Ruído exterior

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dunlop Winter

87%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Dunlop Winter

Efficientgrip SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Winter

Test profile

Molhado

Seco

Custos

Conforto

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação