Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Prémio

GoodYear

Efficientgrip SUV

R16 – R22

VS

Prémio

Bridgestone

Comparar também com

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Perfil do teste

Efficientgrip SUV

Blizzak LM-005

WinterCraft WP52+

UltraGrip Performance+

Número de testes

—

49

3

23

Melhor posição

—

#1

#4

#1

Posição média

—

3.2

4.3

3.3

Teste mais recente

—

2024

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

123

213

97

176

Molhado

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

93%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Frenagem úmida

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Curva em círculo molhado

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Seco

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Comportamento em condução seca

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

76%

Manuseamento a seco

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

93%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Travagem a seco

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

92%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Custos

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Resistência ao rolamento

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

88%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

87%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Quilometragem

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

64%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Conforto

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Ruído exterior

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Ruído interior

GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip SUV vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Efficientgrip SUV

Blizzak LM-005

WinterCraft WP52+

UltraGrip Performance+

Perfil do teste

Molhado

Seco

Custos

Conforto

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação