Comparação: Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Prémio

Goodyear

EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

R13 – R

VS

Prémio

Michelin

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test profile

EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

e.Primacy

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Número de testes

5

4

18

3

1

Best position

#1

#3

#1

#2

#1

Average position

2.0

12.0

6.1

3.7

3.3

1.0

Teste mais recente

2018

2025

2024

2025

2026

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

—

111

47

34

40

64

Molhado

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

90%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Frenagem úmida

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Curva em círculo molhado

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

99%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Todo-o-terreno

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

85%

Seco

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Travagem a seco

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Manuseamento a seco

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

100%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Custos

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

56%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Resistência ao rolamento

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

56%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Conforto

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

52%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Ruído exterior

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

52%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

EfficientGrip SUV 4x4

e.Primacy

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Test profile

Molhado

Todo-o-terreno

Seco

Custos

Conforto

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação