4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Test profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Pirelli
P Zero Winter 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Número de testes
3
2
49
23
Best position
#2
#1
#1
#1
Average position
3.3
2.0
3.2
3.3
Teste mais recente
2026
2025
2024
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
40
48
213
176

Molhado

Molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Frenagem úmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
59%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
13%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Curva em círculo molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%

Seco

Seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Travagem a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Manuseamento a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Desempenho em piso seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
Comportamento em condução seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
76%
Mudança de faixa seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Resposta da direcção seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%

Conforto

Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Ruído exterior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Ruído interior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%

Custos

Custos
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Resistência ao rolamento
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Quilometragem
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Eficiência de combustível
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação