4 Lojas · 0+ Produtos

Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Perfil do teste

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Pirelli
P Zero Winter 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Número de testes
3
2
49
2
Melhor posição
#2
#1
#1
#1
Posição média
3.3
2.0
3.2
1.0
Teste mais recente
2026
2025
2024
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
40
48
213
23

Molhado

Molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Frenagem úmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
59%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
13%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Curva em círculo molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%

Seco

Seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Travagem a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Manuseamento a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Desempenho em piso seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
Comportamento em condução seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
Mudança de faixa seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Resposta da direcção seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%

Conforto

Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Ruído exterior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Ruído interior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%

Custos

Custos
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Resistência ao rolamento
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Quilometragem
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação