4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

Test profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P
Número de testes
3
4
23
29
Best position
#2
#3
#1
#1
Average position
3.3
12.0
3.3
3.7
Teste mais recente
2026
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
40
111
176
178

Molhado

Molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Frenagem úmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
76%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
82%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
78%
Curva em círculo molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Guia lateral húmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%

Seco

Seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
86%
Travagem a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
74%
Manuseamento a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Desempenho em piso seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
59%
Comportamento em condução seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
76%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
91%
Mudança de faixa seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
87%
Resposta da direcção seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
89%

Conforto

Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
83%
Ruído exterior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
81%
Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79%
Ruído interior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
80%

Custos

Custos
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
92%
Quilometragem
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
37%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação