4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Test profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Número de testes
3
4
24
17
Best position
#2
#3
#1
#1
Average position
3.3
12.0
2.7
1.7
Teste mais recente
2026
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
40
111
302
80

Molhado

Molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Frenagem úmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Curva em círculo molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Desempenho em molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Seco

Seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Travagem a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Manuseamento a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Desempenho em piso seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Comportamento em condução seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
78%
Resposta da direcção seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Mudança de faixa seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%

Conforto

Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Ruído exterior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
Ruído interior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
98%

Custos

Custos
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Resistência ao rolamento
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Quilometragem
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação