Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Prémio

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

WinterCraft WP52+

UltraGrip Performance+

9.0

R15 – R22

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

PremiumContact 7

Test profile

Efficientgrip Performance 2

WinterCraft WP52+

UltraGrip Performance+

Número de testes

3

23

Best position

#2

#4

#1

Average position

3.3

4.3

3.3

Teste mais recente

2026

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

40

97

176

Molhado

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Frenagem úmida

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Curva em círculo molhado

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Seco

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Travagem a seco

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Manuseamento a seco

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Desempenho em piso seco

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

72%

Comportamento em condução seca

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

76%

Mudança de faixa seca

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

74%

Resposta da direcção seca

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Conforto

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Ruído exterior

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Conforto

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Ruído interior

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Custos

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Resistência ao rolamento

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Quilometragem

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Efficientgrip Performance 2

WinterCraft WP52+

UltraGrip Performance+

Test profile

Molhado

Seco

Conforto

Custos

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação