Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Prémio

GoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

VS

WinterCraft WP52+

PremiumContact 7

9.8

R16 – R21

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 5

Test profile

Efficientgrip Performance 2

WinterCraft WP52+

PremiumContact 7

Número de testes

3

26

Best position

#2

#4

#1

Average position

3.3

4.3

2.2

Teste mais recente

2026

2025

2026

Tamanhos disponíveis

40

97

66

Molhado

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Frenagem úmida

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Curva em círculo molhado

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Desempenho em molhado

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

82%

Continental PremiumContact 7

45%

Seco

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Travagem a seco

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Manuseamento a seco

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Desempenho em piso seco

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

35%

Mudança de faixa seca

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Conforto

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Ruído exterior

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Conforto

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Ruído interior

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Continental PremiumContact 7

88%

Custos

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Resistência ao rolamento

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Quilometragem

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip Performance 2

WinterCraft WP52+

PremiumContact 7

Test profile

Molhado

Seco

Conforto

Custos

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação