4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
3
3
14
3
Best position
#2
#4
#1
#2
Average position
3.3
4.3
3.6
3.3
Teste mais recente
2026
2025
2025
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
40
97
188
40

Molhado

Molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Frenagem úmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Curva em círculo molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Desempenho em molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%

Seco

Seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Travagem a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Manuseamento a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Comportamento em condução seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
Desempenho em piso seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Resposta da direcção seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Mudança de faixa seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Conforto

Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Ruído exterior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Ruído interior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Custos

Custos
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Resistência ao rolamento
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Quilometragem
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação