4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP4 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
3
11
18
3
1
Best position
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
Average position
3.3
11.6
6.1
3.7
1.0
Teste mais recente
2026
2024
2024
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
40
121
47
34
64

Molhado

Molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Frenagem úmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Curva em círculo molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Guia lateral húmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Seco

Seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Manuseamento a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Conforto

Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%

Custos

Custos
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Quilometragem
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação