4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
3
18
4
2
3
Best position
#2
#1
#3
#1
#2
Average position
3.3
6.1
12.0
1.0
3.7
Teste mais recente
2026
2024
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
40
47
111
23
34

Molhado

Molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Frenagem úmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Curva em círculo molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Guia lateral húmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Seco

Seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Travagem a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Manuseamento a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Mudança de faixa seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Resposta da direcção seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Conforto

Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído exterior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%

Custos

Custos
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Resistência ao rolamento
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Quilometragem
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação