4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
3
18
4
26
1
Best position
#2
#1
#3
#1
#1
Average position
3.3
6.1
12.0
2.2
1.0
Teste mais recente
2026
2024
2025
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
40
47
111
66
64

Molhado

Molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Frenagem úmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Curva em círculo molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Guia lateral húmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%

Seco

Seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Manuseamento a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Mudança de faixa seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Resposta da direcção seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%

Conforto

Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%

Custos

Custos
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Quilometragem
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação