4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
3
3
1
Best position
#2
#2
#1
Average position
3.3
3.7
1.0
Teste mais recente
2026
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
40
34
64

Molhado

Molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Frenagem úmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Curva em círculo molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Seco

Seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Manuseamento a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Conforto

Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Custos

Custos
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Quilometragem
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação