4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Número de testes
3
3
24
2
Best position
#2
#2
#1
#1
Average position
3.3
3.7
2.7
1.0
Teste mais recente
2026
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
40
34
302
23

Molhado

Molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Frenagem úmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Curva em círculo molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Desempenho em molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Guia lateral húmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%

Seco

Seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Travagem a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Manuseamento a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Desempenho em piso seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Mudança de faixa seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Resposta da direcção seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%

Conforto

Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Ruído exterior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Ruído interior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Custos

Custos
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Resistência ao rolamento
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Quilometragem
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação