4 Shops · 0+ Products
PNEULAB.EU

Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Prémio
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Prémio
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

8.2
R14 – R22
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+Prémio
GoodYearGoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

9.0
R15 – R22
Falken e.ZiexMédio-alto
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
PILOT ALPIN 5 SportContact 7 WinterContact TS 870

Test profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
3
49
23
3
Best position
#2
#1
#1
#2
Average position
3.3
3.2
3.3
3.7
Teste mais recente
2026
2024
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
40
213
176
34

Molhado

Molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Frenagem úmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Curva em círculo molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Seco

Seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Travagem a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Manuseamento a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Comportamento em condução seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
76%
Desempenho em piso seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
Resposta da direcção seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Mudança de faixa seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Conforto

Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído exterior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Ruído interior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%

Custos

Custos
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Resistência ao rolamento
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Quilometragem
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Eficiência de combustível
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação