4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Test profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Número de testes
3
49
3
24
Best position
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
3.3
3.2
3.7
2.7
Teste mais recente
2026
2024
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
40
213
34
302

Molhado

Molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Frenagem úmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Curva em círculo molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%
Desempenho em molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
Guia lateral húmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%

Seco

Seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Travagem a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Manuseamento a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Desempenho em piso seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
77%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%
Comportamento em condução seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
100%
Mudança de faixa seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Resposta da direcção seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%

Conforto

Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Ruído exterior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%
Ruído interior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Custos

Custos
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Resistência ao rolamento
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
87%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Quilometragem
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação