4 Shops · 0+ Products
PNEULAB.EU

Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Prémio
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Bridgestone Blizzak 6Prémio
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak 6

9.1
R16 – R22
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+Médio-alto
KumhoKumho

WinterCraft WP52+

8.7
R13 – R21
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+Prémio
GoodYearGoodYear

UltraGrip Performance+

9.0
R15 – R22
Also compare with
PILOT ALPIN 5 WinterContact TS 870 PremiumContact 7

Test profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Número de testes
3
14
3
23
Best position
#2
#1
#4
#1
Average position
3.3
3.6
4.3
3.3
Teste mais recente
2026
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
40
188
97
176

Molhado

Molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Frenagem úmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Curva em círculo molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Desempenho em molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
82%

Seco

Seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Travagem a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Manuseamento a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Desempenho em piso seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
72%
Comportamento em condução seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
67%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
76%
Mudança de faixa seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Resposta da direcção seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%

Conforto

Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Ruído exterior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
79%
Ruído interior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%

Custos

Custos
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Resistência ao rolamento
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Quilometragem
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação