4 Shops · 0+ Products
PNEULAB.EU

Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Falken e.Ziex

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Prémio
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Bridgestone Blizzak 6Prémio
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak 6

9.1
R16 – R22
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+Médio-alto
KumhoKumho

WinterCraft WP52+

8.7
R13 – R21
Falken e.ZiexMédio-alto
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
PILOT ALPIN 5 SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7

Test profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
3
14
3
3
Best position
#2
#1
#4
#2
Average position
3.3
3.6
4.3
3.7
Teste mais recente
2026
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
40
188
97
34

Molhado

Molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Frenagem úmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Curva em círculo molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Desempenho em molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
82%
Guia lateral húmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Seco

Seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Travagem a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Manuseamento a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Desempenho em piso seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Resposta da direcção seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Mudança de faixa seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Conforto

Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído exterior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%

Custos

Custos
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Resistência ao rolamento
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Quilometragem
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação