4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
3
14
10
3
3
Best position
#2
#1
#2
#2
#2
Average position
3.3
3.6
6.0
3.7
3.3
Teste mais recente
2026
2025
2026
2025
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
40
188
104
34
40

Molhado

Molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Frenagem úmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Curva em círculo molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Desempenho em molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%
Guia lateral húmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Seco

Seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Travagem a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Manuseamento a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Desempenho em piso seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Mudança de faixa seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Resposta da direcção seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Conforto

Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Ruído exterior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Ruído interior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%

Custos

Custos
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Resistência ao rolamento
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Quilometragem
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação