4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test profile

GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Número de testes
3
14
18
26
Best position
#2
#1
#1
#1
Average position
3.3
3.6
6.1
2.2
Teste mais recente
2026
2025
2024
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
40
188
47
66

Molhado

Molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Frenagem úmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Curva em círculo molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Desempenho em molhado
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
45%
Guia lateral húmida
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
100%

Seco

Seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Travagem a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Manuseamento a seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Desempenho em piso seco
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
59%
Continental PremiumContact 7
35%
Mudança de faixa seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Resposta da direcção seca
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
96%

Conforto

Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Ruído exterior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Conforto
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%
Ruído interior
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%

Custos

Custos
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Resistência ao rolamento
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Quilometragem
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
28%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação