Comparação: Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Hankook ION Evo

Prémio

Goodyear

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

VS

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test profile

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

PremiumContact 6

Tire Grabber GT Plus

ION Evo

Número de testes

5

36

2

1

Best position

#1

#9

#1

Average position

2.2

3.1

9.0

1.0

Teste mais recente

2025

2023

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

63

296

64

Molhado

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Continental PremiumContact 6

84%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

68%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Continental PremiumContact 6

87%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Continental PremiumContact 6

68%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

64%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Continental PremiumContact 6

79%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Frenagem úmida

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Continental PremiumContact 6

91%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

80%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Curva em círculo molhado

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Continental PremiumContact 6

87%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

62%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Todo-o-terreno

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Continental PremiumContact 6

76%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

74%

Tração da grama

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Continental PremiumContact 6

71%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

64%

Tração de cascalho

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Continental PremiumContact 6

65%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

80%

Tração de lama

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

76%

Continental PremiumContact 6

66%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

73%

Tracção da areia

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

80%

Continental PremiumContact 6

86%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

83%

Manuseamento de cascalho

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

76%

Continental PremiumContact 6

93%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

70%

Conforto

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Continental PremiumContact 6

79%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

66%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Ruído exterior

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Continental PremiumContact 6

66%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

72%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Conforto

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Continental PremiumContact 6

100%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

60%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Custos

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Continental PremiumContact 6

79%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

88%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Resistência ao rolamento

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Continental PremiumContact 6

75%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

88%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Preço/valor

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Continental PremiumContact 6

81%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Quilometragem

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Continental PremiumContact 6

85%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Seco

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Continental PremiumContact 6

90%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

64%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Travagem a seco

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Continental PremiumContact 6

92%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

74%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Manuseamento a seco

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Continental PremiumContact 6

92%

General Tire Grabber GT Plus

53%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Hankook ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

PremiumContact 6

Tire Grabber GT Plus

ION Evo

ION Evo

Test profile

Molhado

Todo-o-terreno

Conforto

Custos

Seco

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação