4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Nokian
WetProof
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Número de testes
16
4
14
3
3
Best position
#3
#3
#1
#2
#2
Average position
5.5
12.0
5.6
3.7
3.3
Teste mais recente
2023
2025
2023
2025
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
153
111
47
34
40

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Nokian WetProof
84%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Nokian WetProof
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Nokian WetProof
81%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Nokian WetProof
91%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Nokian WetProof
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Guia lateral húmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Nokian WetProof
89%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Nokian WetProof
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Nokian WetProof
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Nokian WetProof
87%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Comportamento em condução seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Nokian WetProof
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Nokian WetProof
81%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Resposta da direcção seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Nokian WetProof
63%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Nokian WetProof
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Ruído interior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Nokian WetProof
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Nokian WetProof
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Nokian WetProof
60%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Nokian WetProof
61%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Nokian WetProof
56%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Eficiência de combustível
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Nokian WetProof
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação