4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Continental SportContact 7

Test profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Nokian
WetProof
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Continental
SportContact 7
Número de testes
16
4
14
3
5
15
Best position
#3
#3
#1
#2
#1
#1
Average position
5.5
12.0
5.6
3.7
2.2
1.2
Teste mais recente
2023
2025
2023
2025
2025
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
153
111
47
34
63
122

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Nokian WetProof
84%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Nokian WetProof
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental SportContact 7
66%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Nokian WetProof
81%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Continental SportContact 7
85%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Continental SportContact 7
89%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Nokian WetProof
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Continental SportContact 7
95%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Nokian WetProof
91%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Continental SportContact 7
86%
Guia lateral húmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Nokian WetProof
89%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental SportContact 7
80%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Nokian WetProof
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental SportContact 7
91%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Nokian WetProof
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental SportContact 7
94%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Nokian WetProof
87%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental SportContact 7
97%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Nokian WetProof
81%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental SportContact 7
86%
Resposta da direcção seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Nokian WetProof
63%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental SportContact 7
85%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Nokian WetProof
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Continental SportContact 7
78%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Continental SportContact 7
75%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Nokian WetProof
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental SportContact 7
80%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Nokian WetProof
60%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental SportContact 7
79%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Nokian WetProof
61%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Continental SportContact 7
79%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Nokian WetProof
56%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação