Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Prémio

Goodyear

Efficient Grip Performance

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test profile

Efficient Grip Performance

e.Primacy

Ventus Prime 4

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Número de testes

16

4

13

3

1

Best position

#3

#2

#1

Average position

5.5

12.0

6.2

3.3

1.0

Teste mais recente

2023

2025

2026

2025

Tamanhos disponíveis

153

111

530

40

64

Molhado

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Aquaplanagem - cruz

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

59%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplanagem - longitudinal

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Manuseamento em piso molhado

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Frenagem úmida

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Curva em círculo molhado

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Seco

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Manuseamento a seco

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

93%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Travagem a seco

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Conforto

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Ruído exterior

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Ruído interior

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Conforto

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Custos

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Resistência ao rolamento

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Quilometragem

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Efficient Grip Performance

e.Primacy

Ventus Prime 4

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Test profile

Molhado

Seco

Conforto

Custos

Dimensões e preços

Contribuir para a comparação