4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Número de testes
16
4
1
5
3
3
Best position
#3
#3
#1
#1
#2
#2
Average position
5.5
12.0
1.0
2.2
3.3
3.7
Teste mais recente
2023
2025
2025
2025
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
153
111
64
63
40
34

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação