4 Lojas · 0+ Produtos

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Perfil do teste

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
16
4
18
15
3
1
Melhor posição
#3
#3
#1
#2
#2
#1
Posição média
5.5
12.0
6.1
9.0
3.7
1.0
Teste mais recente
2023
2025
2024
2025
2025
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
153
111
47
225
34
64

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Guia lateral húmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Preço/valor
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
97%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Marcas populares
Nova comparação