4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Número de testes
16
4
18
6
1
Best position
#3
#3
#1
#3
#1
Average position
5.5
12.0
6.1
4.7
1.0
Teste mais recente
2023
2025
2024
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
153
111
47
146
64

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
90%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação