4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Michelin Primacy 5

Test profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Michelin
Primacy 5
Número de testes
16
4
18
3
1
3
Best position
#3
#3
#1
#2
#1
#1
Average position
5.5
12.0
6.1
3.7
1.0
4.7
Teste mais recente
2023
2025
2024
2025
2025
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
153
111
47
34
64
126

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Michelin Primacy 5
65%
Guia lateral húmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Michelin Primacy 5
69%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Michelin Primacy 5
76%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação