4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Nokian WetProof vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental SportContact 7

Test profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk
Nokian
WetProof
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
SportContact 7
Número de testes
16
4
21
14
3
15
Best position
#3
#3
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
5.5
12.0
11.9
5.6
3.7
1.2
Teste mais recente
2023
2025
2024
2023
2025
2026
Tamanhos disponíveis
153
111
164
47
34
122

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Nokian WetProof
84%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Nokian WetProof
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental SportContact 7
66%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Nokian WetProof
81%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental SportContact 7
85%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental SportContact 7
89%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Nokian WetProof
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental SportContact 7
95%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Nokian WetProof
91%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental SportContact 7
86%
Guia lateral húmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Nokian WetProof
89%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental SportContact 7
80%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Nokian WetProof
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental SportContact 7
91%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Nokian WetProof
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental SportContact 7
94%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Nokian WetProof
87%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental SportContact 7
97%
Comportamento em condução seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Nokian WetProof
71%
Resposta da direcção seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Nokian WetProof
63%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Continental SportContact 7
85%
Mudança de faixa seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Nokian WetProof
81%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental SportContact 7
86%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Nokian WetProof
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental SportContact 7
78%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Nokian WetProof
86%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental SportContact 7
75%
Ruído interior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Nokian WetProof
69%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Nokian WetProof
53%
Continental SportContact 7
70%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Nokian WetProof
60%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental SportContact 7
79%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Nokian WetProof
61%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental SportContact 7
79%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Nokian WetProof
56%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Preço/valor
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
23%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Nokian WetProof
46%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação