4 Shops · 0+ Products

Comparação: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test profile

Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Número de testes
16
4
21
3
2
Best position
#3
#3
#2
#2
#1
Average position
5.5
12.0
11.9
3.3
1.0
Teste mais recente
2023
2025
2024
2026
2025
Tamanhos disponíveis
153
111
164
40
23

Molhado

Molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Aquaplanagem - longitudinal
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Manuseamento em piso molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Aquaplanagem - cruz
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Curva em círculo molhado
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Frenagem úmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Guia lateral húmida
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%

Seco

Seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Manuseamento a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Travagem a seco
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Comportamento em condução seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Resposta da direcção seca
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%

Conforto

Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Ruído exterior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Ruído interior
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Conforto
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
90%

Custos

Custos
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Resistência ao rolamento
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Quilometragem
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Eficiência de combustível
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Dimensões e preços

Compare preços em todas as dimensões disponíveis para estes pneus.

Contribuir para a comparação

Popular brands
Nova comparação